On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:57:19PM +0100, Christophe Ricard wrote: >> I believe changes done in this patch take benefit of another existing >> function used in acpi gsi context that is doing the >> job as expected. >> >> Do you still believe acpi_dev_irq_flags is more appropriate ? > > I don't have strong feelings about that. I just wanted to point out > there already exists such function. > > However, if you do use acpi_gsi_get_irq_type() I think it should be > placed to the same file as acpi_dev_irq_flags().
And perhaps renamed accordingly acpi_dev_get_irq_type() I suppose. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
