On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Eric Anholt <[email protected]> wrote: > Linus Walleij <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 12/09/2015 06:30 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>>> This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip >>>> to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on >>>> container_of(). >>> >>> This looks like it's fine, but I wonder what is the justification for >>> the change? It might be good to mention that in the commit description. >> >> It is in patch 000/182: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=144966662402660&w=2 > > Thanks, that helps. > > I don't think it makes much sense to remove a module for a device that's > opened,
That is not what we're afraid of really. We are afraid of the actual device going away, like a GPIO on a USB cable that someone unplugs. > Acked-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> Thanks. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
