As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
---
Lee: as mentioned in 00/54: either apply this directly
or ACK it and I will take it into the GPIO tree.
---
 drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c b/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
index bc90efe01b59..ec4438ed2faf 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int msp_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned 
offset)
                return status;
        if (reg == DM355EVM_MSP_LED)
                msp_led_cache = status;
-       return status & MSP_GPIO_MASK(offset);
+       return !!(status & MSP_GPIO_MASK(offset));
 }
 
 static int msp_gpio_out(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to