On Jan 19, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to inquire where we are at with 2.0.3 proper.
CVS is pretty different from 2.0.2:
741 files changed, 69764 insertions(+), 25884 deletions(-)
I've searched bugzilla and we only have 3 blockers reported against <=
2.0.3:
- #858: Subagent exited after an error.
This one does have a patch attached to it, but yet unconfirmed.
However, it looks good to me (from code inspection, mind I didn't
try
it ;-)
- #878: pengine core dump in StopOnebyOne (with fencing enable)
Comment #8 seems to indicate that this might well be fixed as a side
effect of other issues, and no further report has been seen since
November.
I think that got sorted out. I don't know if the LRM changed but I
think I added some filters to the CRM to stop it there (before the PE)
- #1012: GUI crash
No activity at all so far. However, Alan's comment: "So, the
management
client should not loop rapidly if there's no one to connect to."
suggests this might also be fixed by some recent checkins?
There's a bunch of criticals:
- #1008: LRMd consumes too much CPU
Looks like a bug which Andrew also wrestled with in the CRM. Any
comments since?
- #995: Bringing a node up causes resources to be stopped then started
Might in fact be critical. However, Alan hoped that this might be
fixed
in mid-December, so can this one be closed now?
- #1013: mgmt library names are inappropriate
Actually from the point of view of a distributor, this one ought to
be a
blocker. We're about to ship soonish and changing library names
late in
the release cycle is verboten! I've added this comment to the
bugzilla,
and progress would be needed.
Please pick a less colliding name. "mgmtd" for PAM et cetera is also a
symptom of bad naming IMHO.
- #1037: lrmd reports TIMEOUT althogh RA was never called
This looks fairly obscure. I've asked for a clarification with CVS
HEAD,
because we've seen so many changes it's hard to say whether it's still
an issue.
I'm ignoring everything below critical for now; those are, by
definition, not release critical, even though they may be major
annoyances. But I think we need to roll this out _now_. I think we
should, if we decide to give it a thumbs up, be able to roll this out
after a weekend of test cycles.
I'd second that. I've been running a few thousand tests in the last
week and its been pretty damn stable.
The only thing is possible reason (from the CRM-side) to delay a
release is if we can find a root to Peter's CIB problems.
Please review your bugzillas and pending changes in your workspaces
and
let me know what you think about this.
Alan, do you want to drive the release?
--
Andrew Beekhof
"Eating fruit is mean and vicious... keep your hands off Golden
Delicious" - TISM
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
