On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Xun Sun wrote:

> Sorry for the delay of reply. I was really busy these days, at the
> beginning of a semester.

It so happens I was busy on this last night, and again at lunchtime (UK
time) and had just posted a follow-up on the bug report:

  http://www.osdl.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1096

(comment 3).  I won't repeat that detail here.  But it looks as if there
is a clean solution emerging.


> "you"=="Xun Sun<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"? Sorry I don't have a Solaris
> installed on my PC to test with.

I think I meant Jacob (the original reporter).  He and I both have
suitable test environments available.

But note that this is not a Solaris problem.  Rather it is about whether
the python "include" location is in the set of include locations that the
compiler uses.  So it is system-independent.  But default bundlings of
different OSes, and whether or not an application (e.g. python, glib) is
OS-bundled or user add-on, may cause the headers to be outside the usual
"include" set.

-- 

:  David Lee                                I.T. Service          :
:  Senior Systems Programmer                Computer Centre       :
:                                           Durham University     :
:  http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/            South Road            :
:                                           Durham DH1 3LE        :
:  Phone: +44 191 334 2752                  U.K.                  :
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to