Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-04-11T08:57:00, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and what about node attribute changes for things like ipfail?
they don't have to go in the status section.
Non-persistent temporary node attributes however should go there...
by default they do and yes, best practice is probably to put them
there... my point was that we can't rely on attributes only being in
that part of the config.
and what if the GUI wants to change those attributes?
Unless the solution is implemented in the CIB, I believe that's roughly
as good as it's going to get.
As best as I can remember, a CIB-based solution was declared off limits
several times.
We're just trying to muddle through as best we can without the right tools.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
