On Jun 8, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
That may be a silly observation, but if you're only shifting code around, why does this affect the testcases?
not silly at all dear chap...
it changes the oder actions are created in, thus the IDs they get and the order they show up in the .dot file.
Should we normalize this then somehow to be more robust against this in the future?
its better than what it was... at least now they're (mostly) sorted by resource id. but yes, this is a good idea.
For example, when we start the PE rewrite (ok, so, when you do), I'd love it if the same regression tests passed with both (except of course for the explicit cases where features were added/fixed/modified on purpose).
that would make sense
annoying but true (yes I checked that changing the order was all it did).
OK, that was also the impression I got, but wanted to make sure.
np
-- Andrew Beekhof
"Would the last person to leave please turn out the enlightenment?" - TISM
|
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
