On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:

> On 7/20/06, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > [...]
> > > One quesiton... why is that makefile dealing with .pyc files in the
> > > first place? I dont believe they're used anywhere are they?
> >
> > The idea of _PYTHON seems to have been written shortly after the "Goat
> > Book" went to press, so missed the book.
> >
> > Its principle difference from _SCRIPTS (apart from the one you found!) is
> > in cleanly managing of ".pyo" and ".pyc" as they interact with install and
> > uninstall procedures.
>
> i meant why do *we* care... i've never seen any .pyo or .pyc files
> coming from cts.  perhaps i just haven't been looking?

My spotting of them was sometime after running a "BasicSanityCheck".
While doing a later "pkgrm", which ought to have removed the software
including the subdirectories (and which usually successfully did so),
it was unable to remove a couple of subdirs because they were non-empty.
This turned out to be newly created ".pyo" or ".pyc" files (I forget
which).

That was my context, at least.  YMMV.

Hope that helps.

-- 

:  David Lee                                I.T. Service          :
:  Senior Systems Programmer                Computer Centre       :
:                                           Durham University     :
:  http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/            South Road            :
:                                           Durham DH1 3LE        :
:  Phone: +44 191 334 2752                  U.K.                  :
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to