On 2006-08-09T11:16:33, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "ha_clustermsg()" looks worringly non-intuitive and opaque even to a
> relatively experienced Bourne-shell tinkerer. Even if it is technically
> correct, it isn't the world's best example of programming clarity!
Hm, it looks obvious to me, but the $* really is confusing.
> Is Matt encountering yet another Bourne-vs.-Bash issue lurking hidden in
> that dark undergrowth?
>
> Does it need a re-think?
Many places in the code can do with being cleaned up - we've got quite a
bit of janitor work... I'm always glad if someone wishes to help with
this!
> or:
> # copy stdin (text) to FIFO, with surrounding ">>>" and "<<<" marker lines.
> # no args.; no result
> ha_clustermsg() {
> (echo ">>>"; cat -; echo "<<<") >> $HA_FIFO
> }
I like this approach best.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
