Hi, On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:06:11PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2006-08-10T17:28:37, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > IPaddr2 is the way how IP addresses on Linux should be handled _always_ > (unless we still have 2.2 kernel users around, which I think we > shouldn't strive too hard to support). > [...]
Though I'd suspect that majority of HB based clusters run on Linux, I didn't find IPaddr2 very popular (at least judging by the lists). And there was also this small bug which rendered the script unusable, at least for those who're not into shell scripting, which is also telling. Is it a grave sin to use IPaddr instead of IPaddr2 on Linux? Shouldn't it in that case be renamed to sth like IPaddr-Linux to make it more obvious which RA one should choose? Cheers, Dejan _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
