On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:51:09 -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: > Horms wrote: >> What will be the procedure for updating STABLE_1_2 and other older but >> somewhta maintained brances? > > If I understand the scheme correctly, each of them has their own > Mercurial repository. > > Andrew: Right? Or totally hosed up?
Yes, I believe that they do. What I was wondering about is, will each of the old cvs branches have a working, testing and stable scheeme like the main (HEAD) tree? Or will there be a simpler/different mechanism to push changes as those trees presumably receive a lot fewer commits. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
