Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Let's continue this here instead of the tutorial ;-)
>
> I apologize for saying that these two exit codes for LSB scripts don't get
> mapped to stopped; the code does do that. I'd argue it's wrong though. Here's
> what the LSB says:
>
> # 0 - service up and running
> # 1 - service dead, but /var/run/ pid file exists
> # 2 - service dead, but /var/lock/ lock file exists
> # 3 - service not running (unused)
> # 4 - service status unknown :-(
>
>
> 1 & 2 thus mean "something left around", which ought to imply we should
> clean it up as failed; clearly, 1 & 2 are not "cleanly stopped".
It is not running -that's clear. I tend to think that service not
running is the same as dead.
I think there's room for a difference of opinion on this. My guess is
that the difference is mostly theoretical.
If you kill -9 a service, then you're going to get exit 1 or 2. I don't
think that warrants failing to start the service - which is what we'd do
if we didn't map it into 7.
You didn't offend me at all. But, since I did write the exit code
mapping stuff, I was pretty sure about it ;-).
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
