On 3/6/07, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:03:19AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>coincidentally i already applied something equivalent to the first
>part of this patch a couple of days ago
Did you also fix other cases of fopen() followed immediately by
fclose()/ftell()/fprint() with no error checking?
i didn't but will do so now
I've seen at least two more cases.
On line 112 of crm/cib/io.c, fopen() is followed immediately by ftell()
with no error checking.
On line 332 of crm/pengine/ptest.c, fopen() is followed immediately by
fprint() with no error checking.
Aníbal
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
