Just to follow-up: I eventually realized that I still had the PKG_CONFIG_PATH set to the dir for 32-bit packages. Once I unset that I was able to get past that error. Now I'm getting a slew of errors about lib/crm/pengine/native.c. In looking at it I realize that it has all sorts of problems (line breaks where they shouldn't be, semicolons where they shouldn't be). I'm trying to compile heartbeat-2.0.8.tar.gz as I got it from http://linux-ha.org/download/index.html. Should I be working with a different version?
Thanks, Jake. ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vanderdray, Jacob Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Linux-ha-dev] Compiling Heartbeat on rhel 5 64-bit Server I've been having trouble getting heartbeat to compile under RedHat Enterprise Linux Server (64-bit). To start with I had to install a number of dependencies and I went through the RedHat network to do that, but ConfigureMe configure was still failing on glib2 (despite the fact that I'd installed the glib2-devel package). Doing a little investigating I found that doing "export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkgconfig" made the configure script happy, but when I tried to run ConfigureMe make it skipped all the glib2 libraries saying that they were incompatible. More digging showed that the glib2-devel package from RedHat lacked /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc along with /usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include/ and some other stuff. On a hunch I checked the glib2-devel rpm for rhel 5 workstation and sure enough it had everything, so I manually downloaded and installed that and was able to get further... Now I'm getting what I believe is a problem between 64-bit vs 32-bit. The error is: ipcsocket.c: In function 'socket_verify_auth': ipcsocket.c:2329: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ipcsocket.c:2333: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size I've found some references to problems compiling older versions of ipcsocket.c on a 64 bit platform, but none of those seem relevant. I'd REALLY appreciate any pointers and hopefully I've been verbose enough that the next person who does a Google search about this won't have to email the list. Thanks, Jake.
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
