On 2007-05-21T18:19:58, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is sort of a new branch of this thread... :)
>
> And this time it is the other way around: changes done by me (and
> possibly others) are credited to Alan ;-) Or am I missing
> something. At any rate, they show in more than one changeset.
> Here goes:
>
> $ hg log -r 7052caef59e5
> changeset: 10577:7052caef59e5
> parent: 10576:4b4fc04624bb
> parent: 10525:f3fed6ba5f59
> user: Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> date: Fri Apr 27 14:02:20 2007 -0600
> summary: Merge in from upstream
That's a merge. Alan did the merge, so those changes show up as his; if
you run hg annotate on a file, those will be fine.
Could we all please get over the fact that mercurial is different from
CVS, and that it is even documented to be? ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
