On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:31:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> [ Once again, this time to the list ! ]
> 
> As pointed out to me by my colleague Matsuda-san,
> it seems that G_main_setall_id() really ought to
> pass its elapsed parameter on to G_main_setmaxdispatchtime_id().
> 
> The line in question was last moified by the following changset,
> which creates the G_main_setall_id() setup function and
> seems to also create this slight problem.

Ok, this is not my day. The changeset is 4896848a8d42

http://hg.beekhof.net/lha/crm-dev/rev/4896848a8d42

> Cc: Daiki Matsuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> diff -r 63a0f1fab2a7 lib/clplumbing/GSource.c
> --- a/lib/clplumbing/GSource.c        Wed May 30 00:49:08 2007 +0200
> +++ b/lib/clplumbing/GSource.c        Wed May 30 18:14:59 2007 +0900
> @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ G_main_setall_id(guint id, const char * 
>  {
>       G_main_setdescription_id(id, description);
>       G_main_setmaxdispatchdelay_id(id, delay);
> -     G_main_setmaxdispatchtime_id(id, delay);
> +     G_main_setmaxdispatchtime_id(id, elapsed);
>  }
>  
>  static void          TempProcessRegistered(ProcTrack* p);
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to