On 6/4/07, Otte, Joerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, the patch works. But now I stumbled across the next crash. I am now trying the 2.09 Version from SuSE.Cib crashes shortly after a reboot of the second node: #0 0xfee4d1be in msg2ipcchan (m=0xffffffff, ch=0x8091498) at cl_msg.c:2028 2028 if (ch->ops->send(ch, imsg) != IPC_OK) { (gdb) where #0 0xfee4d1be in msg2ipcchan (m=0xffffffff, ch=0x8091498) at cl_msg.c:2028 #1 0xfedc51cb in hb_api_signoff (cinfo=0xffffffff, need_destroy_chan=1) at client_lib.c:470 #2 0xfedc5351 in hb_api_delete (ci=0x80a0dc0) at client_lib.c:501 #3 0x0805f1a2 in main (argc=1, argv=0x8047770) at main.c:216 (gdb) p *ch $2 = {ch_status = 134814800, farside_pid = -1, ch_private = 0x807b9e0, ops = 0xffffffff, msgpad = 0, bytes_remaining = 4294967295, should_send_block = 0, send_queue = 0xffffffff, recv_queue = 0xffffffff, pool = 0xffffffff, high_flow_mark = -1, low_flow_mark = -1, high_flow_userdata = 0xffffffff, low_flow_userdata = 0xffffffff, high_flow_callback = 0xffffffff, low_flow_callback = 0xffffffff, conntype = -1, failreason = '' <repeats 128 times>} (gdb) p *ch.ops Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffff (gdb)
ok, this is a little more serious. looks like there is a problem in the heartbeat api :-( can you create a bug for this please? If you use the "other" component it will get assigned to the right person (Alan). in the meantime, you can probably just comment out that line as the cib is seconds away from exiting and is "just" cleaning up. were there any errors before the crash? _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
