On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 01:00:14AM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2007-06-07T15:16:18, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can you send over the log for that one. I'm collecting those ;-) > > What are you using the logs for?
Hang them in my living room ;-) Sometimes also trying to figure out a problem of interest. > I can try to find them, I hope I didn't delete them yet. > > > > I _think_ the second cheapest path would be to move the compression out > > > of that layer (and either have the CRM compress the payload directly, or > > > directly compress all FT_COMPRESS data on _add, so that the lower levels > > > never see any uncompressed fields). > > It seems that no estimate on message compression is done, but just > > a regular length estimate. Perhaps the requester should also send > > a hint on how well the data is expected to compress. Otherwise, > > the length checking business could be a bit delayed, but that > > could make the code more complex. > > Right. That's why the compression needs to be done in the *_add call > directly, so that the lower levels need not know about message > compression. > > Hinting is broken by design, and I don't want to see that introduced. Can you elaborate. > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N?rnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ -- Dejan _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
