On 2007-07-11T12:49:38, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But my earlier question still stands: Is there any reason for having it
> installed in two places? Can we simply decide on a single place?
I'd be fine with the new place.
> If that path is different from in earlier releases, does the change matter
> at all? (It couldn't really matter (could it?) if "ha_logger" is simply a
> detail internal to the main heartbeat distribution.)
Well, so far, it should have been an internal detail - as implied by its
location under /usr/lib/heartbeat, just like ptest used to be, or the
ocf-shellfuncs. I doubt that anyone calls it directly.
> But if it is vaguely public (e.g. known by end-user RAs) then we ought to
> do something warning-like from the old, deprecated location to warn the
> user (even if is a warning-per-warning thing).
I decided to go with Alan's judgement on this. I merely cleaned up the
Makefile, I didn't really bother wondering whether it was a sane idea
;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
