On 2007-08-29T17:06:45, Yan Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mgmt patch 6:
> http://coolpix.a-s-k.hk/~gaoyan/heartbeat-0727-replace-uuid.patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Description:
> Use meaningful id instead of UUID for convenience of adding similar
> resources just by replacing appropriate pattern.
This one is slightly more problematic, as the ids could be used several
times this way (the chance of colliding with a UUID is close to zero).
Besides, duplicating all the info - rsc id, attribute set, resource name
- in the ID is not really useful either ;-)
So, I'm not sure about this change. In particular, how do you propose
to handle ID collisions?
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
