Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > High-Availability Linux Development List <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> We are in the final weeks of testing for release 2.1.3 - which has been > >> delayed to the week of Dec 19. > >> > >> Please help us test this upcoming new release! > >> > >> You can get a source tar ball for it from any of these links: > >> http://hg.linux-ha.org/test/archive/tip.tar.bz2 > >> http://hg.linux-ha.org/test/archive/tip.zip > >> http://hg.linux-ha.org/test/archive/tip.tar.gz > >> > >> The latest fixes applied to the 'test' repository can be found here: > >> http://hg.linux-ha.org/test/summary > >> > >> > >> We have already tested this release a good bit, but it needs more > >> testing before release. We do a lot of automated testing, more is > >> always welcome [http://linux-ha.org/CTS]. However, what you can > >> probably help the most with is ad-hoc testing. > >> > >> Don't forget to file bugs on 2.1.3 when you find them. You can find our > >> bugzilla at these URLs: > >> > > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org//query.cgi?product=Linux-HA > >> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org//enter_bug.cgi?product=Linux-HA > >> > >> Thanks in advance for your help and cooperation! > > Maybe I'm a bit late, but are there any objections to get these into 2.1.3, > > or are they left for next year: > > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1659 > > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1761 > > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1743 > > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1731 > > I'm planning on picking those up - I've just been busy. It's not too > late for those kind of patches - they're pretty low-risk. That would be great.
Thanks Sebastian _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
