Hi, On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:03:03PM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > Hi all, > > is anyone actually using the quorum daemon?
That I wouldn't know, but there were quite a few posts about it recently. Though there was not much discussion. So, I'd say that there's interest and probably not many users. > My assessment seems to suggest that it is not workable in any scenario; > but maybe I have missed something? > > If not and I'm right, I am afraid that users might actually deploy it, > thinking it solves something and then be very upset when it fails under > fire. Rule number one is to test all components of the cluster before deploying it. That doesn't mean, of course, that we should ship a substandard software. > Possibly, the prudent action at this time is to disable it from > the package and build by default, until it is completed. I'd agree, if it's really in such a bad state. Otherwise, let's try to fix it. Currently it is the only of the kind which we have. Thanks, Dejan > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N?rnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
