Hi, On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 06:36:12PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote: > Hi again, > > Another request; > Would it be possible to include the following patch in release 2.1.4? > http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/6307bb091d02
That patch is already in lha-2.1: [0]rondo:lha-2.1 > hg log -r 6307bb091d02 changeset: 11726:6307bb091d02 user: Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> date: Fri Dec 21 22:45:04 2007 -0700 summary: snmp_subagent - made it not complain about some things if shutting down > It will help the problems which are posted into Bugzilla 1814, > for all platform not only ppc. > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1814 I suppose that you mean the patch which is attached by Mori-san as an attachment to that bug? I'll apply that one. Thanks, Dejan > > Thanks, > Junko > > > > So, that said, I've pushed my proposed code to > > > http://hg.linux-ha.org/lha-2.1/. It, for reasons outlined above, likely > > > doesn't build yet (because the in-tree packaging is broken), but I > > > wanted to share the scope of changes with you. > > > > There are some fixes about failcount in pacemaker/stable-0.6 recently. > > It seems that some of them slip out of 2.1.4 repository. > > (http://hg.linux-ha.org/lha-2.1/) > > > > It might be difficult to include them because they are fixed as the > > pacemaker's code (like transitioner/events.c), > > but it would be helpful if you release them as Heartbeat 2.1.4. > > > > Changest are here; > > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-0.6/rev/8334d7b6d2e4 > > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-0.6/rev/4622081ce2fc > > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-0.6/rev/97d9fc0dcbd5 > > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-0.6/rev/3c6074b76b99 > > > > Thanks, > > Junko > > > > > As a further point of reference, I'm attaching the SLES changes section > > > to this mail. (bnc# refers to bugzilla.novell.com.) > > > > > > > > > Let me emphasize strongly that I really don't want to step on anyone's > > > toes, or rush the new governance board, but only fill the current void > > > until that is actually operational and has settled down, as I suggest > > > our users need it. > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
