Hi,

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 03:59:48PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:15 PM, HIDEO YAMAUCHI
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> >
> >  > Right. And that got only those very short backtraces. I suppose
> >  > that you didn't get any error messages from gdb?
> >
> >  Yes.
> >  The content moved by the hand is as shown in the mail sent to Mr. Andrew.
> 
> Just "andrew" is fine.  No need for Mr :-)
> 
> >
> >
> >  > Anyway, afterwards you ran gdb by hand, right? How did you
> >  > exactly invoke gdb? I wonder what could have made the difference.
> >
> >  It was made to run as follows.
> >
> >   #gdb /usr/lib64/heartbeat/crmd corefilename
> >
> >  Is something mistake found?
> 
> I'd guess its an environment setting (dejan: LD_LIBRARY_PATH perhaps?)
> thats not set (since hb_report is starting gdb in a non-interactive
> shell)

LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't make a difference. It is also very
seldom used. I really have no idea what's going on.

> 
> >
> >  I'm sorry.
> >  I might not correctly understand your opinion because I am not good at
> >  English.
> >
> >  Regards,
> >  Hideo Yamauch.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  > -----Original Message-----
> >  > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> >  > Dejan Muhamedagic
> >  > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:13 PM
> >  > To: High-Availability Linux Development List
> >  > Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: [RFC] heartbeat-2.1.4
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Hi Yamauchi-san,
> >  >
> >  > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 08:34:42PM +0900, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote:
> >  > > Hi Dejan,
> >  > >
> >  > > > It's strange that hb_report fails to produce good backtraces. How
> >  > > > did you get them from the command line?
> >  > >
> >  > > I used a "hb_report -f 09:00 -u root /root/mast_slave_emg2"
> >  > command-line.
> >  >
> >  > Right. And that got only those very short backtraces. I suppose
> >  > that you didn't get any error messages from gdb?
> >  >
> >  > Anyway, afterwards you ran gdb by hand, right? How did you
> >  > exactly invoke gdb? I wonder what could have made the difference.
> >  >
> >  > Thanks,
> >  >
> >  > Dejan
> >  >
> >  > > Regards,
> >  > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >  > >
> >  > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > > > Hi Yamauchi-san,
> >  > > >
> >  > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:13:28AM +0900, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote:
> >  > > > > Hi,
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > I tried it again.
> >  > > > > The similar situation was generated, but SIGSEGV rose in
> >  > both nodes this time.
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > A position of a DC node was different from the last time.
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > As a result of hb_report, I attach a result of gdb.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > It's strange that hb_report fails to produce good backtraces. How
> >  > > > did you get them from the command line?
> >  > > >
> >  > > > Thanks,
> >  > > >
> >  > > > Dejan
> >  > > >
> >  > > > > Please teach it if there is some insufficient information.
> >  > > > > I will send it later.
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > Regards,
> >  > > > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >  > > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > > > _______________________________________________________
> >  > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >  > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >  > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >  > > >
> >  > > > _______________________________________________________
> >  > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >  > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >  > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >  > > >
> >  > >
> >  > > _______________________________________________________
> >  > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >  > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >  > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >  > _______________________________________________________
> >  > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >  > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >  > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> >  _______________________________________________________
> >  Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >  http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >  Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to