The main reason for not wanting bash was for the Non Linux
architectures (i.e. *BSD and Solaris).
Yes, its a readily available but since it isn't standard and sh
is, whats the big deal ?
Desiging/coding for sh (not for bash) means maximum portability.
Matt
At 06:00 PM 7/16/2008, you wrote:
That is, sorry, a complete waste of time. I never understood why the
project even bothered, and figure it must be some archaic time where
bash was not universally available.
Just put bash into the default dependencies and be done with it.
Sorry if that sounds harsh, but we really have more important topics ;-)
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
