On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:24, Satomi TANIGUCHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > > Thank you for letting me know! > I'll test it. > > Now, may I ask you a question? > cluster-delay seems to still require the value > which is longer than the maximum possible stonith timeout for tengine.
Is this with pacemaker 0.7? If so, can you open a bug for this please? The CRM should be waiting forever. > If cluster-delay is shorter than sum total of plugins' timeout values, > then tengine detect a STONITH op timed out > and new STONITH op is executed. > Then two or more plugins are executed in parallel. > > Will it change in future? > (We are just in a transition period?) > Or did it lose possibility because of my insistence that > "the way to add fence(stonith)-timeuot is better"? > I'm afraid that because Andrew said that > the cluster can just forever for stonithd to return > if stonithd no longer needs a timeout value from crmd... > > > Regards, > Satomi TANIGUCHI > > > > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just to let you know that I renamed fence-timeout to >> stonith-timeout, because there are already stonith-this and >> stonith-that in crm_cluster_properties. Still better to be >> consistently "stonith": naming this "fence-..." would most >> probably confuse people. As if they weren't confused enough ;-) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dejan >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:00:53AM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >>> >>> Hi Satomi-san, >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 05:39:53PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dejan, >>>> >>>> I found some bugs. >>>> >>>> 1) When fence-timeout is not set and priority is set, >>>> priority's value is used as both fence_timeout and priority. >>>> The patch for this bug is fence-timeout.patch >>> >>> Right. An oversight while pondering whether to have it in a loop >>> or wait and see if there'll be more stonithd attributes coming :) >>> >>>> 2) Stonithd can execute only 2 or less plugins. >>>> With 3 or more plugins, priority is ignored. >>>> The patch for this is stonith_rsc_priorities.patch >>> >>> Oh, that code was tricky. Strange that it fails on more than two >>> plugins. >>> >>>> I hope they are helpful to you. >>> >>> Of course. Thanks for the patches and testing! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dejan >>> >>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Satomi TANIGUCHI >>> >>> _______________________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev >>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ >> >> _______________________________________________________ >> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
