I e-Mailed Alan about this last Wednesday and have yet to receive a 
response.  It is a major concern with our production environment.  I hope that 
one of you may have a permanent solution, as I'd rather not reboot servers if 
avoidable.

        One of the systems in question is Linux 2.6.9, heartbeat 
1.2.3.cvs.20050927, and glibc 2.3.4.

        I discovered a thread [1] describing a very similar issue.

        Was this ever corrected in the 1.x branch?  I'd prefer not to 
restandardize production on 2.x yet.  I reviewed the changelogs for both 1.x 
and 2.x, where I could not locate any reference to this bug being corrected.

        In my case, the magical number seems to be 447 days.  I recently had it 
occur again with another heartbeat instance where it hit that mark.  I'm 
concerned about it recurring at a higher uptime too.  Perhaps 447 days is not 
the only trigger.

        I would greatly appreciate any assistance that could be lent.

        Some log output:

heartbeat: 2008/11/11_10:46:37 info: These are nothing to worry about.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 WARN: node fw-02a: is dead
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 ERROR: No local heartbeat. Forcing restart.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 info: Heartbeat shutdown in progress. (3720)
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 WARN: node fw-02b: is dead
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 info: Link fw-02b:/dev/ttyS0 dead.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 info: Link fw-02b:eth1 dead.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 WARN: Late heartbeat: Node fw-02a: interval 41270
 ms
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 info: Giving up all HA resources.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 WARN: Cluster node fw-02b returning after partiti
on.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 WARN: Deadtime value may be too small.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 info: See documentation for information on tuning
 deadtime.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 info: Link fw-02b:eth1 up.
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 WARN: Late heartbeat: Node fw-02b: interval 41650
 ms
heartbeat: 2008/11/11_20:26:19 info: Status update for node fw-02b: status activ
e


Best regards,

   Warner.


[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01449.html
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to