On 2009-09-16T18:35:54, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The send_arp.linux.c code file has different semantics than
> > send_arp.libnet.c
> I added extra handling to try and make them match.
> Did I miss something?
The exit code, at least - arping exits with non-zero if no replies are
received, which is the expected behaviour for unsolicited ARPs. So yes,
it accepts the options, but I'm not sure it behaves in the same way as
the original send_arp.
I think it needs a bit more auditing to make sure - it'd be nice if
someone would step forward to tcpdump the two and check that we're
seeing the same results, and make sure send_arp.linux.c doesn't fail.
Either that, or someone needs to fix the libnet dependency. I'm actually
not much biased either way, as long as IP fail-over works in the end ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
