Hi, I had done some tests for this patch, and I could get the desired results. I think this patch wouldn't affect the current usage.
Serge, Thank you for your review! Thanks, Junko ------- Forwarded message ------- From: "Serge Dubrouski" <[email protected]> To: "Junko IKEDA" <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] recovering from the online backup failure Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:59:38 +0900 Dejan - Please apply this patch so it won't be lost. Thanks. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Serge Dubrouski <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello, Junko - The patch is absolutely all right. Thanks for it. Serge. 2009/11/10 Junko IKEDA <[email protected]>:Hi, This issue is related to this list. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg00024.phpPostgreSQL might become able to remove its lock file automatically in thefuture, but cluster software should be take care of it. It seems that oracle RA handles this situation with running ora_cleanup function which removes a lock file. Serge, What do you think of this patch? Thanks, JunkoOn Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:02:03 +0900, Junko IKEDA <[email protected]>wrote:Hi, If some failures happen during the online backup of PostgreSQL, pgsql can not handle the fail over,because "backup_label", this is a file for a backup process of Postgres,remains on the shared disk. pgsql can not start DB if this file remains. Please see the attached. Thanks, Junko-- Serge Dubrouski.
pgsql.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
