Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 07:55:48PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2009-11-13T11:42:31, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > I would like to hear any opinion. > >> > >> Great idea! But I'd like to suggest a bit different execution, > >> i.e. to have usage like this: > > > > The idea is nice, but what we actually want is a "crm node > > clean-down-confirmation XXX" command, that clears the CIB accordingly. > > > > So I think stonithd isn't actually the best place to implement this. > > Agreed.
Not sure, i.e. would that have use _without_ fencing involved. To have this handled by CRM, crmd would have to cancel the currently running stonith action, i.e. send the appropriate message to stonithd. If handled by stonithd, it would have to cancel the running stonith action and send the OK status to crmd. It basically boils down to the same, but the former needs extra support in crmd. Don't know how much effort that would take and if it would make the code more complex. BTW, this would obviate the need for this patch, but not for the meatware plugin, since the CRM would complain if there are no stonith resources in the configuration with fencing enabled. Thanks, Dejan > Someone create a bug for this? > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
