Hi Hideo-san, Not entirely convinced :) But applied anyway, since it only affects output of the stop operation.
Cheers, Dejan On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:38:11AM +0900, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > > OK. But I'd still like to know what was your motivation. See, all > > other resource agents ignore output of kill and grep and similar. > > What relevant messages did you actually miss in the logs? > > We do not leak the log of the result of these commands for the moment. > But, we think that the failure of these commands should be recorded. > It helps problem solving. > > I revise it from RA to always use. > However, I am ready to review all RA. > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Hideo-san, > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:22:01AM +0900, [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi Dejan, > > > > > > > If you drop 2>&1 this won't be silent status any more :) > > > > > > > > So, I would like to understand what are your circumstances, i.e. > > > > why does this bother you so much that you want it included "by > > > > all means". > > > > > > I forgot an original purpose. > > > The revision of ProcessRunning withdraws it. > > > > OK. But I'd still like to know what was your motivation. See, all > > other resource agents ignore output of kill and grep and similar. > > What relevant messages did you actually miss in the logs? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dejan > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
