On 2009-12-10T21:45:34, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> There are several packages using /usr/lib/heartbeat and similar.
Yeah, but that was mostly a legacy thing, I thought - on a system
without heartbeat installed, this is sort of a confusing artifact. The
only thing were we have a hard time changing it are binary names (such
as hb_report) or public interfaces (provider="heartbeat").
Everything else is supposed to use %{name} under share/lib etc, I think
FHS suggests that.
> What's the point of confusing people? There could also be a
> possibility of a regression.
That's how I stumbled across this, actually; it's changing path names
for the SLE packages ;-)
> Must say that I was also not aware of the change, it probably
> happened while I was not around.
The move happened when the packages were split, I think.
> P.S. "glue" doesn't carry much meaning.
Oh I'm not disagreeing that "glue" isn't a great choice. But changing
pathnames always sucks, so if we change it once more, we should chance
it to something permanent.
For resource-agents, I thought "resource-agents" actually was a pretty
good name for the DTD though ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
