Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > As I wrote in another message, I don't think that's good. It is > going to prevent the CRM from ever trying to start the resource > on that node (until cleanup/cluster restart). >
Ok, reverted ;-p > In short, for such resource agents, it would be good to act > differently on probes and monitors. You mean that "probe" is a valid parameter for the RA, and that would be called instead of monitor if present? -- Cristian Mammoli APRA SISTEMI srl Via Brodolini,6 Jesi (AN) tel dir. 0731 719822 Web www.apra.it e-mail [email protected] _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
