On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > It's time to figure out how to maintain the new Resource Agents > repository. Fabio and I already discussed this a bit in IRC. > There are two options: > > a) everybody gets an account at github.com and commit rights, > where everybody is all people who had commit rights to > linux-ha.org and rgmanager agents repositories. > > b) several maintainers have commit rights and everybody else > sends patches to a ML; then one of the maintainers does a > review and commits the patch (or pulls it from the author's > repository).
I suspect you want b) with maybe 6 people for redundancy. The pull request workflow should be well suited to a project like this and impose minimal overhead. The ability to comment on patches in-line before merging them should be pretty handy. You're also welcome to put a copy at http://www.clusterlabs.org/git/ Its pretty easy to keep the two repos in sync, for example I have this in .git/config for matahari: [remote "origin"] fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* url = [email protected]:matahari/matahari.git pushurl = [email protected]:matahari/matahari.git pushurl = ssh://[email protected]/git/matahari.git "git push" then sends to both locations > > Option a) incurs a bit less overhead and that's how our old > repositories worked. Option b) gives, at least nominally, more > control to the select group of maintainers, but also places even > more burden on them. > > We are open for either of these. > > Cheers, > > Fabio and Dejan > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
