Hi,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:50:02AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Corvus Corax wrote:
> > --- Filesystem 2011-03-22 14:49:58.103845191 +0100
> > +++ Filesystem_lw 2011-03-22 14:49:32.396825985 +0100
> > @@ -186,7 +186,9 @@
> > # Take advantage of /etc/mtab if present, use portable mount command
> > # otherwise. Normalize format to "dev mountpoint fstype".
> > list_mounts() {
> > - if [ -f "/etc/mtab" -a -r "/etc/mtab" ]; then
> > + if [ -f "/proc/mounts" -a -r "/proc/mounts" ]; then
> > + cut -d' ' -f1,2,3 </proc/mounts
> > + elif [ -f "/etc/mtab" -a -r "/etc/mtab" ]; then
> > cut -d' ' -f1,2,3 </etc/mtab
> > else
> > $MOUNT | cut -d' ' -f1,3,5
This is not current Filesystem code. For non-bind mounts
/proc/mounts is preferred. More details here:
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2388
Thanks,
Dejan
> IIRC, it was a concious decision to prefer /etc/mtab over /proc/mounts
> because it is needed for bind mounts, and various other aspects.
>
> The exact reasons probably deserve some comments in the script.
> If someone can remember a bit more detail?
>
> You are of course free to symlink /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts,
> if you feel that this is useful for your setup.
>
>
> --
> : Lars Ellenberg
> : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
> : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
