On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:01:40PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Junko-san, > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 06:42:52PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > May I suggest that you go with the devel version, because > >> > crm_cli.txt was converted to crm.8.txt. There are not many > >> > textual changes, just some obsolete parts removed. > >> > >> OK, I got "crm.8.txt" from devel. > >> > >> Each directory structure for Pacemaker 1.0,1.1 and devel is just a bit > >> different. > >> Does 1.0 keep its doc dir structure for now? > > > > Until the next release I guess. > > > >> If so, it seems that just create html file is not so difficult when > >> asciidoc is available. > > > > No, not difficult. It just depends on the build environment. If > > asciidoc is found by configure, then it is going to be used to > > produce the html files. > > Do any distros _not_ ship asciidoc?
AFAIK none of contemporary distributions. And going back three years or so, it's the other way around. > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
