Florian/Team Comments in-line...
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 05:47 -0600, linux-ha-dev-requ...@lists.linux-ha.org wrote: > Darren, > > can you please subscribe to the list as a normal subscriber rather > than > to just the digest, so we can keep this discussion in one thread? Ok, done... The digest mode was "a good idea at the time"... > > On 2011-05-05 04:47, Darren Thompson wrote: > > Florian/Team > > > > There was an error in the GIT-Hub version that was causing my > re-base > > attempts to fail, so I was forced to try to bring my "last known > good" > > version to the same configuration (mostly successful). > > > > I have since found the error in the GIT-Hub version (the > initialisation > > section was wrong, the meta-data error was a 'red herring') so have > been > > found and resolved so I have done an actual re-base now based on the > > GIT-Hub version. > > > > Changes: > > > > 1. Corrected error in utilisation causing ocf to fail in HB_GUI. > > That is not an error; the Github version is correct. The path to the > ocf-shellfuncs library was recently changed upstream; your installed > version is apparently still using the old path. For the Github version > to work on your system, you will have to apply the attached patch > after > you check out. If I had any idea how to use GIT and apply patches, this whole conversation would never be happening ;-) Did I mention that I'm not normally a "coder/developer"? > Note that normally people would be building the whole resource-agents > package from a git checkout and use _that_ on their test system, but > you're not using git, so that option is out for you. Have I mentioned > that starting to use git would be a good option? Did I ever claim to be "normal"... Mind you, if I told my partner... "normally people would be building the whole resource-agents package from a git checkout and use _that_ on their test system"... she would laugh her head off... I suppose it depends on your definition of "normality"... ;-) Using git would probably be a good option, but "my" requirement is for this to work under "SLES11SP1 with the HA option pack", none of which is consistent with "building the whole resource-agent package", although I do intend to raise a SR with Attachmate/Novell/SuSE for them to come in-line with these standards; as to support their environment on clients sites would be a PITA if they vary too much from the agreed standards. > > > 2. Added "information" to stop section, to provide more feedback > on > > container shutdown/stop (and to assist with future development of > > "containers using alternate 'init' systems"). > > Applied and pushed to my lxc branch. Thank you. Yes I can see that in the on-line version. > > Can you confirm that the current version is working for you and passes > ocf-tester on your system? What is an ocf-tester??? I have been testing this "the hard way" by actually creating and running the agents against actual LXC containers in a running cluster... If there is a simple way of streamlining this testing I'd love to hear more about it. (Did I mention that I'm not normally a "coder/developer"? - Yes I know that's getting repetitive ;-) ) But, back on topic... I can confirm that this agent is working correctly in a "live fire" environment. Darren
<<attachment: face-wink.png>>
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
