Hi Dejan, Thank you for comment.
> In the latest version of ocf-shellfuncs there is some support for > version checks. I did not know that there was the check handling of version in new ocf-shellfuncs. I renew a patch to use the processing. Thanks. Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Mon, 2011/6/6, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:36:01PM +0900, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Sorry.... > > > > + if [ ${ver_str[0]} -le 2 -a ${ver_str[1]} -le 5 ]; then > > > > I missed. > > > > + if [ ${ver_str[0]} -lt 2 -o ${ver_str[0]} -eq 2 -a ${ver_str[1]} -lt 5 > > ]; then > > In the latest version of ocf-shellfuncs there is some support for > version checks. > > Cheers, > > Dejan > > > Thanks. > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > --- On Mon, 2011/6/6, [email protected] > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I send a patch in conjunction with the status processing. > > > It is made the following modifications. > > > > > > * Carry out status processing in a version judgment > > > * Change of the parameter check > > > * Error log when status processing failed > > > * Value set of the ret variable > > > > > > I send the patch of other corrections later. > > > > > > Please comment on all of you for the patch. > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 2011/6/3, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:03:20PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: > > > > > On 06/03/2011 11:45 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > > > > Regressions are bad. You have to keep in mind that not everybody > > > > > > runs the latest release of postfix. This really needs to be fixed > > > > > > before the release. > > > > > > > > > > it's no regression but has been like that since the initial release. > > > > > see commit e7af463d or > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/blame/master/heartbeat/postfix#LID100 > > > > > > > > > > i didn't know this until Noah brought this to my/our attention: > > > > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/72379#72379 > > > > > > > > OK. I misunderstood the post, it seemed to me as if status had > > > > been introduced in the latest set of patches. This is another > > > > matter then. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > raoul > > > > > -- > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > > > > DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. [email protected] > > > > > Technischer Leiter > > > > > > > > > > IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OG web. http://www.ipax.at > > > > > Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. [email protected] > > > > > 1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030 > > > > > FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15 > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
