Hi Raoul, > > to my knowledge, the ra's output is logged by pacemaker. > > moreover, postfix logs to the mail facility itself. > > > > what are the reasons for separately capturing and logging > > all output? > > When a problem occurred, the output of detailed log helps an operator. > In addition, pacemaker can give only the log that ra output in std.
My the third patch was wrong. And log of postfix helps a manager enough. Please abandon my the third patch to a trash box. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Thu, 2011/6/9, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Raoul, > > Thank you for the merge of the patch. > > > to my knowledge, the ra's output is logged by pacemaker. > > moreover, postfix logs to the mail facility itself. > > > > what are the reasons for separately capturing and logging > > all output? > > When a problem occurred, the output of detailed log helps an operator. > In addition, pacemaker can give only the log that ra output in std. > > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > --- On Thu, 2011/6/9, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 07.06.2011 04:40, [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I contribute my last patch.(patch3) > > > This is a patch for the sources which applied patch 1. > > > It is the patch which output the details of the error in log. > > > > hi! > > > > to my knowledge, the ra's output is logged by pacemaker. > > moreover, postfix logs to the mail facility itself. > > > > what are the reasons for separately capturing and logging > > all output? > > > > (mainly patch3) > > > > thanks, > > raoul > > > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
