Hi,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:30:43AM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> Hi Dejan
> 
> > Certainly there is a way to set a system wide environment
> > variable. Perhaps it depends on the distribution.
> OK. Then it is deleted JAVA_HOME It is surely bad to do.
> 
> > But what's the point? The RA allows java_home to be set, so you
> > can do that. If somebody else has an environment already set
> > which includes JAVA_HOME, then they can skip setting this
> > parameter. Where do you see a problem?
> I thought that JAVA_HOME was not set. Therefore I set required=1.
> 
> In java_home, the problem does not occur because I can set it.
> However, I thought that I should set required=1 if JAVA_HOME was not set.
> 
> Please destroy this patch.

OK.

Thanks,

Dejan

> Regards,
> Tomo
> 
> 2011/11/14 Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:03:40PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> >> Hi Dejan
> >>
> >>  Thank you for a reply.
> >>  JAVA_HOME is necessary by all means to start JBoss.
> >>  I did not understand a method to hand an environment variable from the 
> >> outside.
> >
> > Certainly there is a way to set a system wide environment
> > variable. Perhaps it depends on the distribution.
> >
> >>  Therefore I deleted change and JAVA_HOME to a required parameter.
> >
> > But what's the point? The RA allows java_home to be set, so you
> > can do that. If somebody else has an environment already set
> > which includes JAVA_HOME, then they can skip setting this
> > parameter. Where do you see a problem?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Tomo
> >>
> >> 2011/11/14 Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:08:53PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> >> >> Hi
> >> >>
> >> >>  It is not usually possible that an environment variable passes.
> >> >>  Therefore I revised java_home in a required parameter.
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, we cannot do this. It will break existing installations.
> >> > Why would you need this parameter to be required?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Dejan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> Tomo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> >> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________________
> >> > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to