Hi Florian, On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:43:43PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:39:04PM -0400, Chris Bowlby wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Ok, I'll look into csync, and will concede the point on the RA syncing > >> the out of chrooted configuration file. > >> > >> I still need to find a means to monitor the DHCP responses however, as > >> that will just improve the reliability of the cluster itself, as well as > >> the service. > > > > I'm really not sure how to do that. > > > > Didn't review the agent, but on a cursory look, perhaps you could > > provide the default for chrooted_path (/var/lib/dhcp). > > > > BTW, did you think of adding an ocft test case? > > Please, cut the new guy some slack. :) Evidently this is Chris' first
Oh, sorry if I were pushy, certainly not my intention, anyway, just a suggestion, for it is very comforting to be able to run the tests and be confident that the latest modification didn't (thoroughly) break the RA. Cheers, Dejan > contributed RA, and he has been enormously responsive to our > suggestions, and has drastically improved his agent from his first > submission. I'm sure he'll get to ocft in due course. > > Cheers, > Florian > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
