Hi Hideo-san, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 06:21:00PM +0900, [email protected] wrote: > Hi All, > > I made the patch which revised the old next problem. > > * http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/70262 > > In consideration of influence when a parameter was changed, I replace only a > value of timeout. > > Please confirm my patch. > And please commit a patch.
It looks like a wrong place for a fix. Shouldn't crmd send all environment? It is only by chance that we have the timeout value available in this function. Cheers, Dejan > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
