Hi,

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:20:53PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> Hi Dejan
> 
>  I have two reasons to change the process check.
>  1)There is the pattern that pgrep does not work by contents to set in
> CATALINA_OPTS. For example, they are as follows.
>    e.g.)-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
>  2)It does not support plural parameters.
> 
>  Therefore I want to change a process check.

OK, I understand now :)

Patch applied (finally). Many thanks!

Cheers,

Dejan

> Regards,
> Tomo
> 
> 2011年11月17日14:51 nozawat <[email protected]>:
> > Hi Dejan
> >
> > When I set CATALINA_OPTS from the outside, it is as follows.
> >
> > 1)It is set CATALINA_OPTS by crm-configure.
> > 2)It is set CATALINA_OPTS by external file(setenv.sh)
> >  ->setenv.sh is called from run.sh
> >  ->In this case I set -Dname by all means.
> >
> > In this case it causes a mistake.
> > Therefore I think that I should not use CATALINA_OPTS by a process
> > monitoring when I consider outside setting.
> >
> > Does not it become a reason to change the process monitoring?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tomo
> >
> > 2011/11/11 nozawat <[email protected]>:
> >> Hi Dejan
> >>
> >>>What is overwritten?Which environment variable do you refer to?
> >> It is CATALINA_OPTS.
> >>
> >> When CATALINA_OPTS is set from the outside, a right process check is
> >> not possible.
> >> It occurs at following time.
> >> 1.-Dname is not set(Outside setting).
> >> 2.When -Dname is different.
> >> 3.When setting of CATALINA_OPTS is different by cib and outside setting
> >>
> >> When I set CATALINA_OPTS in the tomcat-ra from the outside, there is
> >> the same definition to two places(cib and setenv.sh),and When I set
> >> -Dname definitely.
> >> It moves. However, is not it confusing?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Tomo
> >>
> >> 2011/11/10 Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:55:57PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> >>>> Hi Dejan
> >>>>
> >>>> > Are we sure that the pid file is _always_ going to exist and
> >>>> > contain the PID?
> >>>> I believe that PID file exists, and I include pid.
> >>>> BTW, it is the next sentence to be important by this change.
> >>>>
> >>>> > What's wrong with setting the tomcat_name parameter when it's really
> >>>> > needed (i.e. it is different from the default "tomcat")?
> >>>> For example, it may not move when CATALINA_OPTS is catalina.sh and is
> >>>> overwritten.
> >>>> It is to move without a problem even if an environment variable is set
> >>>> from the outside that I need.
> >>>
> >>> I'm sorry, but I don't understand much of this. Could you please
> >>> rephrase. "may not move", what may (not) move? What is
> >>> overwritten? Which environment variable do you refer to?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Dejan
> >>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Tomo
> >>>>
> >>>> 2011/11/4 Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>:
> >>>> > Hi,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:31:10AM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> >>>> >> Hi Dejan
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>  Sorry,I got a wrong attached file.
> >>>> >>  I send a right file.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Are we sure that the pid file is _always_ going to exist and
> >>>> > contain the PID? What's wrong with setting the tomcat_name
> >>>> > parameter when it's really needed (i.e. it is different from the
> >>>> > default "tomcat")?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > If you don't produce good arguments, this change looks
> >>>> > superfluous to me.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Cheers,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Dejan
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> Regards,
> >>>> >> Tomo
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> 2011/11/1 Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>:
> >>>> >> > Hi,
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:36:10AM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> >>>> >> >> Hi
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>  I changed the method of the process check in tomcat-ra.
> >>>> >> >>  SEARCH_STR does not function when I set tomcat parameter in 
> >>>> >> >> catalina.sh.
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > This is the same one like the other to remove the pid file.
> >>>> >> > Wrong patch attached?
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > Thanks,
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > Dejan
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> >> Regards,
> >>>> >> >> Tomo
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________________
> >>>> >> >> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >>>> >> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >>>> >> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > _______________________________________________________
> >>>> >> > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >>>> >> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >>>> >> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> _______________________________________________________
> >>>> >> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >>>> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >>>> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >>>> >
> >>>> > _______________________________________________________
> >>>> > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >>>> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >>>> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >>>> >
> >>>> _______________________________________________________
> >>>> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >>> _______________________________________________________
> >>> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >>>
> >>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to