Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:17:34AM +0900, nozawat wrote: > Hi Dejan > > How do you think about a patch of this tomcat?
Applied. Cheers, Dejan > The following patches want more you to look. > This is a patch of the changes by a process check, but speaks the > reason that I want to change. > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/75839#77203 > > Regards, > Tomo > > ---------- 転送メッセージ ---------- > From: nozawat <[email protected]> > 日付: 2011年12月12日18:23 > 件名: [PATCH]Comment for tomcat-ra and status-action and correction of > the parameter check > To: High-Availability Linux Development List <[email protected]> > > > Hi > > I made the following modifications in tomcat-ra. > 1.tomcat-001.patch > The default had a description to be called root in the comment of > the tomcat_user parameter. > However, I deleted the comment because there was not the default in root. > > 2.tomcat-002.patch > I made modifications now because nothing did the status action to > carry out a monitor. > > 3.tomcat-003.patch > I added a check of JAVA_HOME and CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE > like jboss-ra. > > Regards, > Tomo > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
