Hello all,

Sorry for crossposting, but can anybody comment on the matter
bellow? Thanks!

Dejan

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 02:22:35PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Hideo-san,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:28:12AM +0900, [email protected] wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> > 
> > How do you think about this matter?
> 
> I'm still inclined to drop vgck from monitor and use it just
> before start. I wouldn't even consider that a regression.
> 
> I'm also not sure what does vgck offer in comparison with
> vgdisplay and if both actually work with the on-disk lvm
> meta-data. In that case we should drop vgdisplay as well and find
> another (and better) way to monitor VGs.
> 
> Anybody with deeper knowledge on LVM?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dejan
> 
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > 
> > 
> > --- On Thu, 2011/12/8, [email protected] 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Dejan,
> > > 
> > > Thank you for comment.
> > > We examine a correction of LVM_validate_all.
> > > Because the handling of vgck influences it, I am going to obey the 
> > > decision of this argument.
> > > 
> > > For example, even the following simple choice may be good.
> > >  * Add "exec_vgck" parameter
> > >   * true(default) : Exec vgck command.
> > >   * false : Not exec vgck command.
> > > 
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > > 
> > > --- On Tue, 2011/12/6, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Hideo-san,
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:13:31AM +0900, [email protected] 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi Dejan,
> > > > > Hi Xinwei,
> > > > >  
> > > > > We pay attention to this correction, too.
> > > > >  
> > > > > Did the discussion advance afterwards?
> > > > > Was the method of the correction decided?
> > > > 
> > > > Actually not, it somehow slipped off my radar.
> > > > 
> > > > Xinwei suggested in his latest message to run vgck on probe, but
> > > > this may result in error if the device isn't ready yet (it may
> > > > happen say with iscsi). So, I think that we should just drop vgck
> > > > altogether.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Dejan
> > > > 
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > > > >  
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > ha-wg-technical mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > ha-wg-technical mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical
> > > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ha-wg-technical mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ha-wg-technical mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical
> _______________________________________________
> ha-wg-technical mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to