Hello Serge 2012/3/9 Takatoshi MATSUO <[email protected]>: > Hello Serge > > 2012/3/8 Serge Dubrouski <[email protected]>: >> Hello, Takatoshi - >> >> On one hand this is a good feature to have, but on another if it's not >> stable, fails most of the time and brings to much of complexity to the RA >> then drop it. >> It seems like Andrew has plans to include support for stopping >> resources on demote in the future versions of Pacemaker. > > It's a good news. > I will remove code of restarting for the future. > Please accept a little complexity until future version is released.
I removed code of restarting and I reconsider some checks of inconsistency. In this change PGSQL.lock file is created on promote and it's removed on demote only if there is no Slave. And I removed a complex check before start such as checking Timeline ID , Checkpoint because PGSQL.lock can means inconsistency. I want to adopt a serious stance for merging by now. Do you have any other comments ? And what's the first step for merging ? >> >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Serge >>> >>> I think about removing code of restarting PostgreSQL on demote. >>> Because almost restarts are failed to avoid data inconsistency. >>> In addition this check is complex. >>> PostgreSQL developer says that this occurrence is specific and >>> can't be fix immediately. >>> >>> What do you think ? Regartds, Takatoshi MTSUO _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
