On 03/30/2012 04:58 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:28:42PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: >> Earlier I mentioned the problem with portreserve (which was apparently >> ignored?) > No. > But I cached a cold. Sorry to hear that :-(. Hope you're feeling better now. You have my full sympathies - since I had bronchitis that lasted over two weeks. > And you did not send a patch, did you? Good point. Sorry to be a whiner... I was hoping for a little more conversation in any case. >> Now I have run into another problem. When you set LRM parameters in >> /etc/sysconfig, the code assumes that the LRM will start within 20 >> seconds of starting heartbeat. That is not the case. >> >> lrmd was changed to getenv() it's max-children meanwhile. >> >> You need to cherry pick that patch, or update glue. Good to hear that's changed. I put a patch of my own into my local copy - just extending the loop and making it not print those annoying '.'s or delay startup while waiting. So, I'm good locally - and there's no need for a patch for the future.
I guess I need to make a workspace so I can submit patches properly (as you noted above). On the other hand, the good news though is that by upping that limit to 16 and switching from a group to explicit dependencies, the failover time was cut from about 60 seconds to about 18 seconds - so I'm happy. -- Alan Robertson<al...@unix.sh> - @OSSAlanR "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/