On 22 June 2012 17:20, Lars Ellenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:29:43PM +0700, Philippe Alcoy wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Philippe Alcoy <[email protected]>
> > # Date 1340188944 -25200
> > # Node ID f6ce2daddba6234643f715c46b28d5562940eb1f
> > # Parent add12b838ef461b20eec223e551bf508038dc640
> > Fix ha.cf node parsing in ha_propagate
>
> Someone is actually *using* this?
> and even with multiple nodes per "node" line in ha.cf?
Probably not. I was just curious and tested it in the lab.
> > diff -r add12b838ef4 -r f6ce2daddba6 heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in
> > --- a/heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in Mon Apr 09 17:50:27 2012 +0200
> > +++ b/heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in Wed Jun 20 17:42:24 2012 +0700
> > @@ -27,9 +27,8 @@
> > for line in f:
> > if line.startswith("node"):
> > toks = line.split()
> > - if (len(toks) == 2):
> > - nodeName = toks[1]
> > - nodes.append(nodeName)
> > + if (len(toks) > 0):
>
> I'd suggest to use > 1.
If you decide to keep ha_propagate, I would recommend > 0.
The script would work even if for some unknown reasons there is only
one node in the list.
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
