On 10/24/2014 03:32 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2014-10-23T20:36:38, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> wrote: > >> If we want to require presence of start-stop-daemon, >> we could make all this somebody elses problem. >> I need find some time to browse through the code >> to see if it can be improved further. >> But in any case, using (a tool like) start-stop-daemon consistently >> throughout all RAs would improve the situation already. >> >> Do we want to do that? >> Dejan? David? Anyone? > I'm showing my age, but Linux FailSafe had such a tool as well. ;-) So > that might make sense. > > Though in Linux nowadays, I wonder if one might not directly want to add > container support to the LRM, or directly use systemd. With a container, > all processes that the RA started would be easily tracked.
Process groups do that nicely. The LRM (at least used to) put everything in a process group. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
