On 3/28/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:40:10PM -0400, Bjorn Oglefjorn wrote:
> Functionally, how does this influence the behavior of the cluster?
It doesn't AFAIK. But it keeps the LRM part (status) smaller at
times. And prevents polution in case the resource is removed. Note
that removing a resource from the configuration part doesn't do
the same for the status section. Now, I guess that in some cases,
but I can't recall any right now, it would be important to keep
the LRM records. Andrew?
nod. though i dont recall the reason either...
if you enable it and have problems though, then I'll certainly make
sure they get fixed.
> Thanks, Dejan.
Welcome.
> --BO
>
> On 3/28/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:53:01AM -0400, Bjorn Oglefjorn wrote:
> >> This option (remove_after_stop) does not seem to be documented in the
> >wiki.
> >> Could someone explain exactly what this controls/means? Thanks in
> >advance.
> >
> >It removes the resource from the status section of the CIB.
> >
> >> --BO
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-HA mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
> >--
> >Dejan
> >_______________________________________________
> >Linux-HA mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
--
Dejan
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
